<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!-- This template is for creating an Internet Draft using xml2rfc,
    which is available here: http://xml.resource.org. -->
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629-xhtml.ent">
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
<!-- used by XSLT processors -->
<!-- For a complete list and description of processing instructions (PIs), 
    please see http://xml.resource.org/authoring/README.html. -->
<rfc
      xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"
      category="std"
      docName="draft-cz-bier-bgp-ls-bier-te-ext-06"
      ipr="trust200902"
      obsoletes=""
      updates=""
      submissionType="IETF"
      xml:lang="en"
      tocInclude="true"
      tocDepth="4"
      symRefs="true"
      sortRefs="true"
      version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 2.38.1 -->
  <!-- category values: std, bcp, info, exp, and historic
    ipr values: trust200902, noModificationTrust200902, noDerivativesTrust200902,
       or pre5378Trust200902
    you can add the attributes updates="NNNN" and obsoletes="NNNN" 
    they will automatically be output with "(if approved)" -->

 <!-- ***** FRONT MATTER ***** -->

 <front>
    <!-- The abbreviated title is used in the page header - it is only necessary if the 
        full title is longer than 39 characters -->

   <title abbrev="BGP-LS extensions for BIER-TE">BGP-LS extensions for BIER-TE</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-cz-bier-bgp-ls-bier-te-ext-06"/>
    <!-- add 'role="editor"' below for the editors if appropriate -->

   <!-- Another author who claims to be an editor -->

	
	   <author fullname="Ran Chen" initials="R." surname="Chen">
      <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>
          <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->

         <city>Nanjing</city>
          <region/>
          <code/>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>chen.ran@zte.com.cn</email>
        <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
     </address>
    </author>
	
	 <author fullname="Zheng Zhang" initials="Z." surname="Zhang">
      <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>
          <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->

         <city>Nanjing</city>
          <region/>
          <code/>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn</email>
        <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
     </address>
    </author>
	
		
	 <author fullname="Yisong Liu" initials="Y." surname="Liu">
      <organization>China Mobile</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>
          <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->

         <city>Beijing</city>
          <region/>
          <code/>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>liuyisong@chinamobile.com</email>
        <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
     </address>
    </author>
		
 <author fullname="Changwang Lin" initials="L." surname="Changwang">
      <organization>New H3C Technologies</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>
          <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->
         <city>Beijing</city>
          <region/>
          <code/>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>linchangwang.04414@h3c.com</email>
        <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
     </address>
    </author>
	
    <date year="2026"/>
    <!-- If the month and year are both specified and are the current ones, xml2rfc will fill 
        in the current day for you. If only the current year is specified, xml2rfc will fill 
	 in the current day and month for you. If the year is not the current one, it is 
	 necessary to specify at least a month (xml2rfc assumes day="1" if not specified for the 
	 purpose of calculating the expiry date).  With drafts it is normally sufficient to 
	 specify just the year. -->

   <!-- Meta-data Declarations -->

   <area>Routing</area>
    <workgroup>BIER</workgroup>
    <!-- WG name at the upperleft corner of the doc,
        IETF is fine for individual submissions.  
	 If this element is not present, the default is "Network Working Group",
        which is used by the RFC Editor as a nod to the history of the IETF. -->

   <keyword>Internet Draft</keyword>
    <!-- Keywords will be incorporated into HTML output
        files in a meta tag but they have no effect on text or nroff
        output. If you submit your draft to the RFC Editor, the
        keywords will be used for the search engine. -->

   <abstract>
      <t>BIER-TE forwards and replicates packets based on a BitString in the packet header, but every BitPosition of the BitString of a BIER-TE packet indicates one or more adjacencies.</t>
	 <t>BGP Link-State (BGP-LS) enables the collection of various topology informations from the network, and the topology informations are used by the PCE to calculate the path and then propagate them onto the BFRs(instead of having each node to calculate on its own) and that can be for both inter-as and intra-as situations.</t>
	 <t>This document specifies extensions to the BGP Link-state address-family in order to advertise BIER-TE informations.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Introduction</name>
	 <t>Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER)-TE shares architecture and packet formats with BIER as described in <xref target="RFC8279"/>. BIER-TE forwards and replicates packets based on a BitString in the packet header, but every BitPosition of the BitString of a BIER-TE packet indicates one or more adjacencies as described in <xref target="RFC9262"/>.</t>
	 <t>When BIER-TE is enabled in an IGP domain, BIER-TE-related informations will be advertised via IGP. The flooding scope for the IGP extensions for BIER-TE is IGP area-wide. by using the IGP alone it is not enough to construct across multiple IGP Area.</t>
	 <t>The BGP-LS address-family/sub-address-family have been defined to allow BGP to carry Link-State informations. This document specifies extensions to the BGP Link-state address-family in order to advertise BIER-TE-specific informations, Similar to BGP-LS Advertisement of IGP Traffic Engineering Performance Metric Extensions(<xref target="RFC8571"/>). An external component (e.g., a controller/a PCE(see <xref target="RFC4655"/> for PCE-Based Architecture , <xref target="RFC5440"/> for PCEP and <xref target="RFC5376"/> for Inter-AS Requirements for the PCEP.))then can learn the BIER-TE informations in the &quot;northbound&quot; direction and calculate BIER-TE Path and then propagate them onto BFRs (instead of having each BFR to calculate on its own), and that can be for both inter-as and intra-as situations. </t>
	
     <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Requirements Language</name>
        <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
        NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
        "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
        described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119" format="default"/> <xref target="RFC8174" format="default"/>
        when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      </section>
	  </section>
	  
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>BGP-LS Extensions for BIER-TE</name>
		<t><xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-ospf"/> and <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-isis"/> specifies IGP extensions for distributing the BitPositions configured on a BFR with MPLS and Non-MPLS encapsulation for BIER-TE in a BIER-TE domain. and then external component (e.g., a controller) need to collect the BitPositions configured on a BFR with MPLS and Non-MPLS encapsulation for BIER-TE in the "northbound" direction within the BIER-TE domain.</t>
	
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
    <name>Link Attribute TLV</name>
 <t>The following Link Attribute TLV is defined: </t>
  <figure anchor="xml_happy2">
   <artwork align="center" name="Table 1: The new Link Attribute TLV" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[	
 +======+=============================+=============+
 | Type |         Description         |   Section   |
 +======+=============================+=============+
 | TBD1 |            Link-BP          | section 3.2 |
 +------+-----------------------------+-------------+

   ]]></artwork>
 </figure>
   <section numbered="true" toc="default">
    <name>The Link-BP TLV</name>
	<t>The Link-BP TLV is defined to advertise a link BitPosition (BP). The informations are derived from Link-BP Sub-TLV of IS-IS (section 2.1 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-isis"/>)  and OSPF (section 2.1 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-ospf"/>). According to different subdomain, the Link-BP TLV may appear multiple times.</t>
   <t>The following Link-BP TLV is defined:</t>
  <figure anchor="xml_happy3">
   <artwork align="center" name="Figure 1: The Link-BP TLV" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[	
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |          Type (TBD1)          |             Length            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | sub-domain-id |      BAR      |    IPA        |  Reserved     |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |         BitPosition           |           EndBitPosition      |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
   ]]></artwork>
 </figure>	
  <t>Type: TBD1, see IANA Considerations section.</t>
  <t>Length: 2 octets.</t>
 <t>Subdomain-id: Unique value identifying the BIER-TE sub-domain, 1 octet.</t>   
 <t>BAR: A 1-octet field encoding the BIER Algorithm, used to calculate underlay paths to reach BFERs. Values are allocated from the "BIER Algorithms" registry which is defined in <xref target="RFC8401"/>. </t>
 <t>IPA: A 1-octet field encoding the IGP Algorithm, used to either modify,enhance, or replace the calculation of underlay paths to reach BFERs as defined by the BAR value. Values are from the IGP Algorithm registry. </t>
 <t>BitPosition: A 2-octet field encoding the BitPosition locally configured on the link/interface when the Link Type of the link in the Router-Link TLV containing this Sub-TLV is 1 (i.e., Point-to-Point connection to another router) or 2 (i.e., connection to Transit Network or say LAN).</t>  
 <t>EndBitPosition: A 2-octet field encoding the BitPosition of the connection on the designated Intermediate Systems (Dis) end (ISIS) / designated router (DR) end( OSPFv2 and OSPFv3), as defined in section 2.1 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-isis"/> , section 2.1 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-ospf"/>.</t>
 </section>
 </section>
	
	<section numbered="true" toc="default">
    <name>Node Attributes TLVs</name>
	<t>The following Node Attribute TLVs are defined: </t>
  <figure anchor="xml_happy4">
   <artwork align="center" name="Table 2 The new Node Attribute TLVs" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[	
 +======+================================+=============+
 | Type |         Description            |   Section   |
 +======+================================+=============+
 | TBD2 |       Routed-BP                | section 3.3 |
 +------+--------------------------------+-------------+
 | TBD3 |      Localdecap-BP             | section 3.4 |
 +------+--------------------------------+-------------+
 | TBD4 |  BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation    | section 3.3 |
 +------+--------------------------------+-------------+
 | TBD5 | BIER-TE Non-MPLS Encapsulation | section 3.4 |
 +------+--------------------------------+-------------+
 
   ]]></artwork>
 </figure>
 
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
    <name>The Routed-BP TLV</name>
	<t>The Routed-BP TLV is defined to advertise a forward routed BitPosition (BP). The informations are derived from Node BPs TLV and Routed-BP Sub-TLV of IS-IS (section 2.1 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-isis"/>)  and OSPF (section 2.1 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-ospf"/>). According to different subdomain, the Routed-BP TLV may appear multiple times.</t>
   <t>The following Routed-BP TLV is defined:</t>
  <figure anchor="xml_happy5">
   <artwork align="center" name="Figure 2: The Routed-BP TLV" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[	
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |          Type (TBD2)          |             Length            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | sub-domain-id |      BAR      |    IPA        |  Reserved     |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |         BitPosition           |             BFR-id            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
   ]]></artwork>
 </figure>	
  <t>Type: TBD2, see IANA Considerations section.</t>
  <t>Length: 2 octets.</t>
 <t>Subdomain-id: Unique value identifying the BIER-TE sub-domain, 1 octet.</t>   
 <t>BAR: A 1-octet field encoding the BIER Algorithm, used to calculate underlay paths to reach BFERs. Values are allocated from the "BIER Algorithms" registry which is defined in <xref target="RFC8401"/>. </t>
 <t>IPA: A 1-octet field encoding the IGP Algorithm, used to either modify,enhance, or replace the calculation of underlay paths to reach BFERs as defined by the BAR value. Values are from the IGP Algorithm registry. </t>
 <t>BitPosition: A 2-octet field encoding the BitPosition configured on a BFR for a forward routed adjacency to a remote BFR.</t>  
 <t>BFR-id: A 2-octet field encoding the BFR-id of the remote BFR.</t>
 </section>
 
     <section numbered="true" toc="default">
    <name>The Localdecap-BP TLV</name>
	<t>The Localdecap-BP TLV is defined to advertise a localdecap BitPosition (BP). The informations are derived from Node BPs TLV and Localdecap-BP Sub-TLV of IS-IS (section 2.1 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-isis"/>)  and OSPF (section 2.1 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-ospf"/>). According to different subdomain, the Routed-BP TLV may appear multiple times.</t>
   <t>The following Localdecap-BP TLV is defined:</t>
  <figure anchor="xml_happy6">
   <artwork align="center" name="Figure 3: The Localdecap-BP TLV" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[	
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |          Type (TBD3)          |             Length            |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | sub-domain-id |      BAR      |    IPA        |  Reserved     |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |         BitPosition           |             Reserved          |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 
   ]]></artwork>
 </figure>	
  <t>Type: TBD3, see IANA Considerations section.</t>
  <t>Length: 2 octets.</t>
 <t>Subdomain-id: Unique value identifying the BIER-TE sub-domain, 1 octet.</t>   
 <t>BAR: A 1-octet field encoding the BIER Algorithm, used to calculate underlay paths to reach BFERs. Values are allocated from the "BIER Algorithms" registry which is defined in <xref target="RFC8401"/>. </t>
 <t>IPA: A 1-octet field encoding the IGP Algorithm, used to either modify,enhance, or replace the calculation of underlay paths to reach BFERs as defined by the BAR value. Values are from the IGP Algorithm registry. </t>
 <t>BitPosition: A 2-octet field encoding the localdecap BitPosition configured on a BFR.</t>  
 </section>

    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
     <name>BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation TLV</name>
     <t>The BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation TLV is used in order to advertise MPLS specific informations used for BIER-TE. It MAY appear multiple times. The informations are derived from BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation Sub-TLV of OSPF (section 2.3.1 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-ospf"/>).</t>
     <t>In some environment, each router allocates its labels, and advertises it to the controller.That solution is simpler as the controller does not need to deal with label allocation. If the controller has to deal with Label allocation , there needs to be a (global) range carved out such there are no conflicts. We can avoid all that by having the router allocate the BIER Label range and advertise it to the controller.</t>
     <t>The following the BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation TLV is defined:</t>

     <figure anchor="xml_happy7">
     <artwork align="center" name="Figure 4: The BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation TLV" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[		
0                   1                   2                   3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          Type (TBD4)          |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Max SI      |BS Len |                    Label              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   ]]></artwork>
   </figure>	
    <t> Type: TBD4, see IANA Considerations section.</t> 
	<t> Length: 4.</t>
    <t> Max SI: A 1-octet field encoding the maximum Set Identifier(as defined in <xref target="RFC8279"/>), used in the encapsulation for this BIER subdomain for this BitString length.</t>
    <t> BS Len: A 4-bit field field encoding the Bitstring length as per <xref target="RFC8296"/>.</t>
	<t> Label: First label of the range, 20 bits.  The labels are as defined <xref target="RFC8296"/>. The 4 leftmost bits MUST be ignored.</t>
	<t> BS length in multiple MPLS Encapsulation TLV associated with the same BIER-TE information TLV MUST NOT repeat, otherwise only the first MPLS Encapsulation TLV with such BS length MUST be used and any subsequent MPLS Encapsulation TLVs with the same BS length MUST be ignored.</t>
	 </section>
		  
	<section numbered="true" toc="default">
     <name>BIER-TE Non-MPLS Encapsulation TLV</name>
	 <t>The BIER-TE Non-MPLS Encapsulation TLV is used in order to advertise Non-MPLS encapsulation(e.g. ethernet encapsulation ) capability and other associated parameters of the encapsulation. It MAY appear multiple times. The informations are derived from BIER-TE Non-MPLS Encapsulation Sub-TLV of OSPF (section 2.3.2 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-te-ospf"/>).</t>
	 <t>The following the BIER-TE Non-MPLS Encapsulation TLV is defined:</t>
	 <figure anchor="xml_happy8">
        <artwork align="center" name="Figure 5: The non-MPLS Encapsulation TLV" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[			
0                   1                   2                   3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          Type (TBD5)          |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Max SI      |BS Len |                  BIFT-id              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   ]]></artwork>
 </figure>	 
    <t> Type: TBD5, see IANA Considerations section.</t> 
	<t> Length: 4.</t>
    <t> Max SI:A 1-octet field encoding the maximum Set Identifier(as defined in <xref target="RFC8279"/>), used in the encapsulation for this BIER subdomain for this BitString length.</t>
	<t> The "BIFT-id range" is the set of 20-bit values beginning with the BIFT-id and ending with (BIFT-id + (Max SI)).  A unique BIFT-id range is allocated for each BitString length and sub-domain-id.  These BIFT-id's are used for BIER forwarding as described in <xref target="RFC8279"/>)and <xref target="RFC8296"/>.</t>
    <t> Local BitString Length (BS Len): A 4-bit field encoding the Bitstring length as per <xref target="RFC8296"/>. </t>
	<t> BIFT-id:A 20bit field encoding the first BIFT-id of the BIFT-id range. The BIER-id are as defined in <xref target="I-D.ietf-bier-lsr-non-mpls-extensions"/>.</t>
	  </section> 
	</section> 
  	</section>  
	<section numbered="true" toc="default">
    <name>IANA Considerations</name> 
    <t>IANA maintains a registry group called "BGP-LS NLRI and Attribute TLVs" in the "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Parameters" registry group. </t>
	<t>The following TLV codepoints are suggested (for early allocation by IANA):</t>
    <table anchor="table_example4" align="center">
         <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="center">Code Point</th>
              <th align="center">Description</th>
			  <th align="center">Value defined in</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="center">TBD1</td>
              <td align="center">Link-BP</td>
			  <td align="center">this document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center">TBD2</td>
              <td align="center">Routed-BP</td>
			  <td align="center">this document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center">TBD3</td>
              <td align="center">Localdecap-BP</td>
			  <td align="center">this document</td>
            </tr>
		   <tr>
              <td align="center">TBD4</td>
              <td align="center">BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation</td>
			  <td align="center">this document</td>
            </tr>
		   <tr>
              <td align="center">TBD5</td>
              <td align="center"> BIER-TE Non-MPLS Encapsulation</td>
			  <td align="center">this document</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
		</table>  
</section>
     <section numbered="true" toc="default">
     <name>Security Considerations</name> 
    <t> Procedures and protocol extensions defined in this document do not
   affect the BGP security model. See the "Security Considerations"section of <xref target="RFC4271"/> for a discussion of BGP security. Security considerations for acquiring and distributing BGP-LS information are discussed in <xref target="RFC9552"/>.</t>
   </section>
	
	<section numbered="true" toc="default">
     <name>Acknowledgements</name> 
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
    
  <!--  *****BACK MATTER ***** -->

 <back>
    <!-- References split into informative and normative -->

   <!-- There are 2 ways to insert reference entries from the citation libraries:
    1. define an ENTITY at the top, and use "ampersand character"RFC2629; here (as shown)
    2. simply use a PI "less than character"?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119.xml"?> here
       (for I-Ds: include="reference.I-D.narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis.xml")

    Both are cited textually in the same manner: by using xref elements.
    If you use the PI option, xml2rfc will, by default, try to find included files in the same
    directory as the including file. You can also define the XML_LIBRARY environment variable
    with a value containing a set of directories to search.  These can be either in the local
    filing system or remote ones accessed by http (http://domain/dir/... ).-->

   <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <!--?rfc include="http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"?-->
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.9552.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8279.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8401.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8571.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8296.xml"?> 
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.9262.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-bier-lsr-non-mpls-extensions.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-bier-te-isis.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-bier-te-ospf.xml"?>
    </references>
	<references>
	<name>Informative references</name>
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4271.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4655.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5440.xml"?>
	 <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5376.xml"?>
      </references>
       
    <!-- Change Log

v00 2006-03-15  EBD   Initial version

v01 2006-04-03  EBD   Moved PI location back to position 1 -
                     v3.1 of XMLmind is better with them at this location.
v02 2007-03-07  AH    removed extraneous nested_list attribute,
                     other minor corrections
v03 2007-03-09  EBD   Added comments on null IANA sections and fixed heading capitalization.
                     Modified comments around figure to reflect non-implementation of
                     figure indent control.  Put in reference using anchor="DOMINATION".
                     Fixed up the date specification comments to reflect current truth.
v04 2007-03-09 AH     Major changes: shortened discussion of PIs,
                     added discussion of rfc include.
v05 2007-03-10 EBD    Added preamble to C program example to tell about ABNF and alternative 
                     images. Removed meta-characters from comments (causes problems).

v06 2010-04-01 TT     Changed ipr attribute values to latest ones. Changed date to
                     year only, to be consistent with the comments. Updated the 
                     IANA guidelines reference from the I-D to the finished RFC.
v07 2020-01-21 HL    Converted the template to use XML schema version 3.
    -->
 </back>
</rfc>
